Why are Rails model association results not naturally ActiveRecord::Relations?-Collection of common programming errors
It is an ActiveRecord::Relation
, but Rails is intentionally lying to you. You can see this already in the method calls, and continue to see it by calling ancestors
, which includes a slew of ActiveRecord classes:
c1.articles.ancestors.select { |c| c.to_s =~ /ActiveRecord/ }.size #=> 35
which shows that it is very much not an Array
.
This happens because what you’re getting back when calling c1.articles
is an ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy
*, which undefines class
(along with many other methods). This means that class
gets delegated via its method_missing
, which sends it to target
. As we can see, the class of target
here is, in fact, Array
:
c1.articles.target.class #=> Array
That is where c1.articles.class
comes from. Nevertheless, it is an ActiveRecord::Relation
.
* We can verify that it is indeed an ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy
by calling Ruby’s original class
method on the object in question: Object.instance_method(:class).bind(c1.articles).call
. This is a nice trick to verify that the object is not trying to pretend to be of a different class.
Originally posted 2013-11-09 20:17:55.