How can I use RSpec to test the response code on a CanCan failed authorization?-open source projects ryanb/cancan

I’m working on a rails project in which I use CanCan to authorize my resources. When a user is not signed in and tries to submit a “talk” (via an ajax form submission), CanCan correctly raises a 401 with {"status":"error","message":"You must be logged in to do that!"} as the response (I have verified this in the browser using firebug). However, in my tests get a 302 response code rather than a 401:

class TalksController < ApplicationController
  authorize_resource

  def create
    @talk = current_user.talks.build(params[:talk])

    respond_to do |format|
      if @talk.save
        response = { :redirect => talk_path(@talk) }
        format.html { redirect_to @talk, notice: 'Talk was successfully created.' }
        format.json { render json: response, status: :created,  }
      else
        format.html { render action: "new" }
        format.json { render json: @talk.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
      end
    end
  end
end

talks_controller_spec.rb:

describe TalksController do
  describe "POST create" do
    context "when not signed in" do
      it "should not assign talk" do
        post :create
        assigns[:talk].should be_nil
      end
      it "should respond with a 401" do
        post :create
        response.response_code.should == 401
      end
    end
  end
end

The first example included here is successful (assigns[:talk] does not get assigned), but the second is not:

1) TalksController POST create when not signed in should respond with a 401
     Failure/Error: response.response_code.should == 401
       expected: 401
            got: 302 (using ==)
     # ./spec/controllers/talks_controller_spec.rb:53:in `block (4 levels) in '

I’m not sure exactly what’s going on. Is there a way I can test for the actual response code returned to the browser? Or a better way I can test the authorization?