problem about paradigms-Collection of common programming errors
palindrome
paradigms convention-over-configur
What are the benefits of the “Convention over Configuration” paradigm in web development? And are there cases where sticking with it don’t make sense?Thanks
Charles
oop smalltalk paradigms selflanguage
I’m just looking for what it is that sets Self apart from Smalltalk.This isn’t supposed to be a Gorilla vs Shark question. I’m not looking for reasons one is better, I’m just confused as to what defines one as being distinct from the other. They both appear to be the same language to me after about 2 hours of reading up on them and mucking around with some code (Aside: I finally understand the Smalltalk version of “Everything is an object”. I must say, it’s bloody awesome. Haha! And I thought th
Nils Schmidt
aop paradigms
I know this question has been asked before, but this was one and a half years ago, though I thought it might be the time for a re-questioning. I also recognized it might be seen as subjective, but I guess there are objective reasons for/against AOP.I would be interested in who is using AOP in software development and also why or why not using it.I see AOP as a very strong paradigm which can make a lot of development tasks easier. But when it comes to using AOP in real world projects I have made
Yi Jiang
ruby scala f# functional-programming paradigms
I know a lot of Java people have started looking at Scala since it runs on the JVM, and a lot of people in the Microsoft world are looking at F#, but what does Ruby have as a natural functional successor?In a pure FP sense Ruby doesn’t lack anything, instead it has too much some may say. A functional language forces the programmer to not use global variables and other idioms so much (although it is possible to use globals in functional languages)
Tom Wijsman
paradigms aspect-oriented
Aspect oriented programming promises to deal with cross cutting concerns, but I’m not completely sold on it yet. Have there been any other attempts to deal with this problem?
Jon Purdy
coding cross-platform paradigms games
I’m only 18, and as such my initial ventures into programming were the usual 2000s-dominating high-level, paradigm-saturated affairs, complete with obsession with platform independence and ‘good’ design patterns.However, I also toyed around with other things. Things like a BBC Micro emulator, GAS and NASM assembly language, and completely UNIX-centric non-portable C code. After playing with these, I came to the conclusion that most of these modern design patterns, ‘pure’ paradigms, and obsession
Eric Wilson
functional-programming paradigms trends
I’ve been hearing a lot of enthusiasm about functional programming languages lately, with regards to Scala, Clojure, and F#. I’ve recently started studying Haskell, to learn the FP paradigm.I love it, it’s really fun, and fits my math background.But will it ever really matter? Obviously, it’s hardly a new idea.Here’s my questions:What has contributed to the recent FP enthusiasm? Is is merely boredom with OO, or has something changed to make FP more needed than before? Is this indicative of a
Charles Menguy
aop paradigms
AOP is an interesting programming paradigm in my opinion. However, there haven’t been discussions about it yet here on stackoverflow (at least I couldn’t find them). What do you think about it in general? Do you use AOP in your projects? Or do you think it’s rather a niche technology that won’t be around for a long time or won’t make it into the mainstream (like OOP did, at least in theory ;))? If you do use AOP then please let us know which tools you use as well. Thanks!
Web site is in building